🦋 Inspiration, Perspiration
 A question I need to ask myself about The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind: What does it mean for me to say I like this book, to say that it has influenced my thinking?
I read a lot of novels and stories, and the notion of being influenced by a book I've read is a familiar one to me in the case of fiction -- it means the images from the story have become part of my intellectual currency, part of the landscape of imagery on which I live my internal life... Jaynes' book is clearly not a novel; in order to assimilate his imagery do I need to make the assertion that I believe his psychological theory to be true? That would be
a difficult assertion for me to make. I am not a historian or a neurologist -- while some of the historical and neurological evidence he lays out to back up his theory sounds convincing, some sounds strained, I don't ultimately have the background to judge it valid or not. I appreciate his literary analysis of The Iliad -- it greatly enriches my reading of the poem -- but have trouble accepting that as the basis for a historical theory of consciousness. So I am going to go with the much weaker assertion that Jaynes' model resonates with me: that it gives me a plausible means of understanding my own consciousness, one that matches up with the moments of inspiration which have been part of my experience.
And ultimately that is really what I'm looking for -- a way to understand inspiration. What I'm looking for is a way to write, and to write I need inspiration. The idea that the inspiration coming all-too-seldom to me is the pre-conscious voice of an internal God, and that the perspiration necessary to turn that voice into writing is the process of giving birth to consciousness, well... it works for me. YMMV. (And note, this blog post like most of my posts is almost completely inspiration-free -- a couple of wording choices may have the freshness of inspiration, but in general it is written self-consciously, a product of striving to get at the source of inspiration... That is for me a necessary part of the process.)
posted morning of Saturday, May 7th, 2011
➳ More posts about The Bicameral Mind
➳ More posts about Philosophy
➳ More posts about Readings
I didn't get very far with Jaynes. His attempt to hang so much on the left-brain / right-brain contrast didn't convince me. His historical tale seemed overdone but interesting. It strikes me as a book to plunder but not something to accept as a whole.
posted morning of May 7th, 2011 by John Emerson
Yeah -- that is probably about what I am meaning to say here... Just giving myself permission to make use of some ideas from the book without needing to worry about accepting it as a whole, to admire Jaynes for the power of his voice and of his ideas without needing to think he had all the answers.
posted morning of May 7th, 2011 by Jeremy
| 
