This page renders best in Firefox (or Safari, or Chrome)
READIN
READIN started out as a place for me
to keep track of what I am reading, and to learn (slowly, slowly)
how to design a web site.
There has been some mission drift
here and there, but in general that's still what it is. Some of
the main things I write about here are
reading books,
listening to (and playing) music, and
watching the movies. Also I write about the
work I do with my hands and with my head; and of course about bringing up Sylvia.
The site is a bit of a work in progress. New features will come on-line now and then; and you will occasionally get error messages in place of the blog, for the forseeable future. Cut me some slack, I'm just doing it for fun! And if you see an error message you think I should know about, please drop me a line. READIN source code is PHP and CSS, and available on request, in case you want to see how it works.
See my reading list for what I'm interested in this year.
READIN has been visited approximately 236,737 times since October, 2007.
Thanks to commenter RedRum for finding a bug in my comments code and telling me to fix it -- I put in a quick and easy, but hacky, fix; maybe will think about figuring out a more fully-featured solution.
posted evening of October 26th, 2008: Respond ➳ More posts about The site
Before the movie this afternoon, Ellen and I swung by Montclair Book Center. Ellen picked up Anne of Green Gables, which she has been wanting to read with Sylvia. I went looking to see if they had cheap used copies of any Saramago titles that I haven't read, and found The Stone Raft; and while I was browsing through the used books I found something I'd never heard of before but that looks interesting: Fortunata and Jacinta, by Benito Pérez Galdós (tr. Agnes Moncy Gullón, 1986) -- a weighty 19th-century novel set in Madrid. I'm looking forward to reading it -- the first couple of pages are good reading -- and speculating that it may give me some background for Saramago and other modern Iberian novelists.
A nice passage, from the end of the first chapter. The narrator is describing how Juanito Santa Cruz changed from an avid reader and thinker in college to an anti-intellectual adult:
Living was relating to others, enjoying and suffering, desiring, hating and loing. Reading was artificial borrowed life... He claimed that the difference between these two ways of living was like the difference between eating a chop yourself and having someone tell you how and when someone else ate it, making the story a really good one of course -- describing the expression on the person's face, his pleasure from chewing the meat, his satisfaction upon swallowing it, and then his placid digestion.
I was thinking more today about why I am identifying Scarlet as the main character of In Hovering Flight, and what it means: the plot* is events that happen in the lives of Scarlet's parents and their friends, she is involved mainly as a spectator.
Scarlet is about my age (2 years older), and I can roughly identify all the people in her parents' crowd as people I knew growing up. I am finding it easy to identify with Scarlet's role watching her parents and their friends, forming attachments for some and failing to attach with others, but never really being able to understand them as people rather than as "characters" -- She is experiencing her life as a story told to her.
Something that is really puzzling me: The excerpts from Addie's field journal that are part of this book, are from the first field journal, the one she kept in Tom's class. But it was explicitly pointed out in the first chapter, that this was the journal which Tom would not show to Scarlet, presumably because of its role in the beginning of his and Addie's relationship. So it doesn't fit in with the rest of the book being Scarlet's pov. I'm hoping to get some kind of explanation for this before too long.
Note: Chapters Nine and Ten are some of the best writing so far. I'm hoping for more of this, it's really comfortable to read.
* Understood to mean "the plot thus far" -- I've only read half the book so far. These ideas are developing as I progress through it.
So the reason I wanted to see Rachel Getting Married, was the music, specifically Robyn Hitchcock. And I think the music was probably the best thing about the movie, in the end. But look: the music was sufficiently great that I can say that without denigrating the rest of the picture; it was a really fine movie.
A review I read (maybe in the Times?) criticized the reception scene as killing the rhythm of the movie and its plot, making the viewer lose track of what's going on. This seems like an absolutely baffling response to the movie (assuming I'm remembering it right); the reception was a totally integral part of what was going on (which was after all a wedding), it intensified and crystallized the characters, particularly of Kim and her mother.
Hm, just thinking this post needs a little more -- I finished it in a hurry before dinner -- The reason I chose the title I did is that I flashed on that song at one point in the movie when Kim was watching a car pulling in to her father's driveway. Kim's relationship with cars is definitely a focal point of the plot and of her character. The one thing I really didn't buy in the movie was her accident the night before the wedding -- that (a) was totally predictable and (b) didn't do the work it was supposed to. Auto-accident-as-cathartic-release just doesn't cut it in my book. Her not getting in an accident would have been more compelling; and the fight with her mother fills the need for violent release there.
posted evening of October 26th, 2008: Respond ➳ More posts about Music
Here is a picture I am getting of the political landscape in the US right now. Bear in mind when reading it that I have been wrong about politics... Not sure exactly how often but way more frequently than not.
That said it seems to me like the wheels are really coming off the Southern strategy. I noted previously how the Republican racist innuendo tactics don't look like they're getting any traction -- tactics that have played a major role in not all, but several big national political contests I can remember. Frank Rich writes today (in an excellent column, I really recommend reading the whole thing) that "In the latest New York Times/CBS News and Pew national polls, Obama is now pulling even with McCain among white men, a feat accomplished by no Democratic presidential candidate in three decades, Bill Clinton included." -- This statistic really makes me do a double-take. It makes "white men" seem like a Republican voting bloc, one that is crumbling. And it seems obvious to me based on (again bear in mind that my political literacy is lacking in some key ways) that this bloc has been maintained over the last three decades through appeal to various bigotries. The Republican party has been banking on the strength of ignorance and god willing, they are going to see their investments go down the drain.
The right wing is almost certainly scared that this is exactly what's happening. Take a look at Belle's examination of this fright playing out at the National Review. The Apostropher links to an examination of what's going on at the top levels of the Republican party. 2004 made me extremely leery of hubristic thinking about political victory; but I am hoping against hope that Nixonland's publication marked the beginning of the end of the phenomenon it describes.
(And just to note: I have been waiting for this thing to happen, the thing that I'm speculating is about to happen, since I was 13 years old or so. Wishing for it is a major part of my political consciousness; this is part of the reason I'm skeptical about my accuracy of analysis. And anyways, well, I can still hope for some simulacrum of my dream...)
posted morning of October 26th, 2008: Respond ➳ More posts about Politics
I am finding In Hovering Flight to be very strongly a book about one single character, Scarlet; all the other figures seem to be present in service of her story. This is a pretty common state of affairs with novels, and not something I hold against the book; but it's striking me as odd that so much of the book is devoted to people who are not the primary character -- when I started Chapter Nine this evening I had an immediate reaction of "Oh yeah, now this feels like a novel again!" as Scarlet re-entered the picture, after a long expository section about Tom and Addie's history.
Also in Chapter Nine, beautiful timing:
The oriole's nest, that delicate, swinging pendulum woven from plant fiber and hair, made Scarlet cry every time she saw it. She could still see Richard's face as he held it up for everyone to view one evening at dinner, swinging it slowly back and forth and following it with his eyes, a look of rapture on his face.
"They must build it this way so the wind can rock it back and forth like this, to soothe the babies," he said as he watched the nest. "Like the cradle in the treetop."
Everyone smiled, enjoying the thought, and also Richard's obvious pleasure. No one said anything about how "Rock-a-Bye Baby" ends.
Sylvia has been absolutely absorbed with reading and listening to and watching the Harry Potter books and books-on-tape and movies for a couple of months now. This is my introduction to the series as well -- I am pretty familiar with the plots of books 1 and 6 now from hearing Sylvia's tapes repeatedly, and have a glancing knowledge of the rest of the series from her narration of the events. Somehow it's not really drawing me in to read them myself -- some interesting bits but the overall structure doesn't really appeal to me.
But I did recall having Pullman's His Dark Materials series recommended to me time and again, and that seemed like it would have enough points of similarity to Harry Potter to be generate interest quickly. So we've been starting to read that together over the last few days. Really nice language and plot, and Lyra's character is starting to come together. Sylvia's totally interested in the dæmons, what they are and what they do.
Here are a couple of funky covers of the disco classic.
Tragedy bill themselves as "the #1 heavy metal Bee-Gees tribute band" -- I'm willing to accept this claim at face value as I would never have dreamt of the category existing to begin with. They have some hot tunes; "Stayin' Alive" is my favorite of the ones I've listened to.
...And here is a cover by Ozzy Osbourne, Frank and Dweezil Zappa -- surprising me again: I had no idea any pair of these three had worked on a record together. (I also don't have any verification that it's true, beyond the YouTube caption -- obviously Ozzy is singing the verse and playing guitar, someone else is singing on the break -- possibly this is Zappa père and/or fils. A quick Google search turns up a lot of references to the record (though not all of them mention Frank Zappa being involved) but no dates or personnel information.)* Either way it kicks ass:
* Zappa-head Apostropher confirms this is not a Frank project; it is on Dweezil's 1991 record Confessions. Apo says Dweezil's "actually an excellent metal guitarist, though his guitar playing sounds really, really different from FZ's. There are several live shows where they play together, swapping solos and while they're both impressive, there's never any doubt who's who."
I realized a difference between my guitar playing and my fiddling while I was practicing today -- I approach the guitar from a framework of the music's structure, where I just go with the feel of it on violin. I don't have much clue of what measure I'm playing or often even where the beat is, when I'm playing melody on violin. This is a major shortcoming; and yet I believe I am a much better violinist than I am a guitarist. I am the same with singing -- I think I can sing pretty well, but I don't understand what is happening with the structure of the melody I'm singing. Something to work on -- I would like to be able to understand (and to feel) the chord changes going on under the melody.
posted evening of October 22nd, 2008: Respond ➳ More posts about Guitar
Tonight we're watching Independent Lens' Chicago 10, a dramatization of the 1968 Democratic convention and the Chicago 7 trial. It's very well done, I recommend watching it -- Channel 13 is airing it again tomorrow night.
posted evening of October 22nd, 2008: Respond ➳ More posts about Nixonland
The NY Times today has a brief profile of Murat Belge -- the Turkish scholar whose quote I had chosen to adorn my Pamuk page without knowing anything about him. Interesting dude.
Pandora Brewer eats chili in Cincinnati and 