READIN

🦋 Monterroso on Borges on Kafka

In an essay in Perpetual Motion (the second piece down on the linked page), Monterroso talks about first reading Borges and about becoming slowly immersed in his thinking and his puzzles. It is a very nice introduction to Borges; I was surprised to see that the work which opened Monterroso's eyes was Borges' foreword to his translation (1938) of The Metamorphosis:

When I first found Borges, in 1945, I didn't understand him; he was frankly puzzling for me. Delving into Kafka, I found Borges' foreword to The Metamorphosis; and for the first time I saw before me his world of metaphysical labyrinths, of infinities, of eternities, of tragic trivialities, of quotidian relationships comparable to the worst hell imaginable. A new universe, gleaming, ferociously attractive. Crossing from that foreword to all the rest of Borges' work has been for me (and for many others) an activity as important as breathing, and at the same time as dangerous as walking too close to the edge of a chasm. Following him has meant discovering and descending into new circles: Chesterton, Melville, Bloy, Swedenborg, Joyce, Faulkner, Woolf; taking up old friendships: Cervantes, Quevedo, Hernández; and at last returning to his illusory Paradise of the everyday: the barrio, the movie-house, the detective story.

Critics complain that in Kafka's three novels, there is a lack of linking material; but they recognize that this material is not essential. Myself, I maintain that this criticism indicates a fundamental unfamiliarity with the work of Kafka. The pathos of these "inconclusive" novels arises precisely from the infinite number of obstacles which block, again and again, the paths of his identical protagonists. Franz Kafka did not finish them: their basic property is that they are interminable. Do you remember the first, the most clear of Zeno's paradoxes? Motion is impossible, because before arriving at B we have to cross the intermediate point C, but before we arrive at C, we have to cross the intermediate point D, but before arriving at D... The Greek did not enumerate all of the points; Franz Kafka need not enumerate all the vicissitudes. It is enough for us to understand that they are infinite, like Hell.

As he closes his piece, Monterroso talks about what your encounter with Borges can do to you:

The great problem of reading Borges: the temptation to imitate him is almost irresistable; to imitate him, impossible. Some writers you can get away with imitating -- Conrad, Greene, Durrel -- not Joyce; not Borges. It will sound facile and obvious. The meeting with Borges never takes place without consequences. I've listed here a few of the things that can happen, for better and for the worse:

1. Pass him by without noticing (for the worse).
2. Pass him by; retrace one's steps and follow him for a little while to see what he's doing (for the better).
3. Pass him by; retrace one's steps and follow him forever (for the worse).
4. Find out that one is a simpleton, that until this moment one has never had an idea worth one's while (for the better).
5. Find out that one is intelligent, because one enjoys reading Borges (for the better).
6. Dazzle oneself with the fable of Achilles and the Tortoise; believe that one has figured it all out (for the worse).
7. Discover the infinite and the eternal (for the better).
8. Mull over the infinite and the eternal (for the better).
9. Believe in the infinite and the eternal (for the worse).
10. Leave off writing (for the better).

posted evening of Monday, May 10th, 2010
➳ More posts about Augusto Monterroso
➳ More posts about Readings
➳ More posts about Prólogos
➳ More posts about Jorge Luis Borges
➳ More posts about Translation
➳ More posts about Writing Projects
➳ More posts about Projects

Respond:

Name:
E-mail: (will not be displayed)
Link:
Remember info	Send